遺伝子解析とはすごいもので

それを見ると中国人、韓国人、日本人は全く違う。

アイヌ民族はもっと違う。

これは、何かの番組で高山正之さん、宮崎正弘さんもおっしゃっていたな。

で、その場に数名の論客がいらしたが誰も否定してなかった。

炭素測定（だっけ？）もすごい。

日本の漆は大陸の漆とは種類が違うとか焼失したと言われている法隆寺の柱は西暦５００年代（正確な年代も出ていたが忘れた）の物で、建物も聖徳太子が建てたオリジナルのものだとか、お米は縄文時代から日本で栽培されていたとか。

ブログ主の世代は半島からヒトが渡ってきて縄文人と交わり日本人の祖先となった。

その流れで稲作も半島から伝えられた　と教わった。

ぜんぜん違うのである。　新しい解析技術や新しい発見，それに伴う新しい考えかたはこれからも出てくる。

あるべきは柔軟な考え方であり、今までの説に凝り固まった考え方、今まで得た栄光、地位を守ろうとする保身的な振る舞いは学者としては失格だ。

The following text was automatically translated by DeepL.

It shows that Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese are completely different.

The Ainu people are even more different.

This was also said by Masayuki Takayama and Masahiro Miyazaki in some program, wasn't it?

And there were a few debaters there, but none of them denied it.

Carbon measurement (is it?) The carbon measurement (or was it?) was also amazing.

He said that Japanese lacquer is different from that of the continent, that the pillars of Horyu-ji Temple, which are said to have been destroyed by fire, are from the 500s (I forgot the exact date), that the building is the original one built by Prince Shotoku, and that rice has been grown in Japan since the Jomon period.

The blogger's generation came from the peninsula and mingled with the Jomon to become the ancestors of the Japanese.

I was taught that rice cultivation was also introduced from the peninsula.

This is completely different.　New analysis techniques, new discoveries, and new ways of thinking will continue to emerge in the future.

What we should have is a flexible way of thinking, but a way of thinking that is entrenched in conventional theories and a defensive behavior that tries to protect the glory and status that we have gained so far are disqualifying for a scholar.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)